santer, Tag

  • Watch the Pea – AR5 Chapter 10 Wed, 14 Dec 11, 6:34am
    As CA readers are aware, key findings of Santer et al 2008 do not hold using updated data. Ross and I submitted a comment to IJC showing this. The comment was rejected twice, with one of the reviewers (as in the case of the...
  • Using Santer’s Method Fri, 13 Aug 10, 10:36pm
    Using Santer’s own methodology with up-to-date observations, here are results comparing observations to the ensemble mean of Chad’s collation of 57 A1B to models to 2009...
  • Today’s post is complementary to MMH10, which, as readers obviously realize, is in Ross’ excellent style. There has been a kneejerk reaction from climate scientists that the article is “wrong” –...
  • The comments by James Annan and his reviewers here on McKitrick et al (2010) demonstrate very nicely how the literature gets distorted by the rejection of a simple comment showing that the application of Santer’s own...
  • CA readers are aware that Ross and I twice submitted a comment on Santer et al 2008 to International Journal of Climatology (both available on arxiv.org), showing that key Santer results (which were based on data only up...
  • FOI Myth #1: USA Tue, 29 Dec 09, 2:30pm
    Climate scientists have recently been promoting the myth that providing data in response to FOI requests was interfering with their work. Nature uncritically accepted this myth in a recent editorial calling for action to...
  • Popular Related Tags: santer, uncategorized, mixed effects, climategate, nlme, random effects, foia, mmh
  • Search for "santer" on our Eco Web Search